Monday, June 29, 2015

Why has the Palm County Sheriff office NOT arrested Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher? Why is Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office protecting Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher even in the face of admitted crimes. Has the PBSO Office been paid off or threatened? Has Andrew Panzer personally been paid off or threatened? Are these admitted crimes legal in Palm Beach County ? With detectives like Andrew Panzer it is easy to see where there is so much probate crime in Palm Beach County Florida.

The Simon Bernstein Estate Case and the Shirley Bernstein Estate Case out of Boca Raton Florida is still going on, three years later. Judges are not ruling per law, Detectives are looking the other way and high finance crimes are RAMPANT.

Below is an email yet AGAIN from Eliot Bernstein to Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, Detective Andrew Panzer, who seems to have no interest in protecting the victims of crimes in Palm Beach county Florida.

"From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 5:58 AM
To: Detective Andrew Panzer @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (; Captain Carol Gregg @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (


Detective Panzer,

After our last several calls it is apparent that the PBSO investigations into the Bernstein case matters has been derailed, stymied and delayed and that instead of investigating these ongoing crimes you have begun doing research on my federal RICO filed and who I copy on emails to you as if this were more important than the crimes reported to your agency.

I am not sure why it matters to you at all why I copied Judge Scheindlin on these matters, especially where there are growing correlations between these new crimes committed to my prior RICO filed and those defendants.

First off, in our last conversation we started with the fact that I am trying to report new crimes to you and simultaneously have some of the older crimes reported investigated that have been ongoing for several years.

I wanted to know why some of the crimes you have absolute admission of were not yet prosecuted, especially where there is admission by Attorney Robert Spallina, Esq. that he and his partner Donald Tescher, Esq. conspired to alter estate documents and then Spallina actually altered the document as admitted to PBSO and transmitted via mail and wire them as part of an elaborate fraud to various parties.

This crime had serious ramifications to beneficiaries of the estate and has cost beneficiaries a loss of monies and further damaged the parties causing almost two years where beneficiaries remain disputed due to the crimes that have failed to be prosecuted.

Your claim that since Spallina and Tescher did not send the fraudulent documents to the court made the crime appear not prosecutable is almost unbelievable as you are certainly aware fraud does not have to take place upon a court to be fraud and prosecutable.

Spallina’s confession to the crime came happened on or about January 2014 and still no arrest has been made since the prior detectives learned of the crime and were then suddenly replaced by you.

Further, Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher both profited from the crimes despite what they may have claimed and other parties are severely economically damaged from the crime as a result.

When I mentioned that I would like to have them arrested you stated that it was not up to me to have them arrested, it was up to you and where I think it is actually up to the State Attorney to determine that and the crime should have been reported to them to determine if prosecution was right.  You stated you were not sure what Detective Miller had done prior and thought he might have dismissed arresting them at the time but for unknown reasons.

I also informed you that Spallina and Moran had perjured their statements and stated initially that the six Moran documents that were forged and fraudulently notarized for six separate parties, including Post Mortem for my deceased father, were the only documents they were aware of and yet with Spallina’s confession to PBSO that he had altered a Shirley Trust document in January 2013 to alter beneficiaries as part of a continued fraud, we now know those statements were false and he knew all along of other fraud that he committed in conspire with Tescher.

This would lead one to believe that Moran should be further prosecuted and investigated regarding her crimes and further prosecuted not only for the crimes she was not charged with initially, like forgery she admitted and any plea she made be stricken as she perjured statements to the Governor Rick Scott’s notary division that contradicted her statements to PBSO.  Spallina made misrepresentations to PBSO during his initial interview regarding the Moran/Tescher & Spallina PA crimes.

I informed you that some of the new crimes may now involve investigating Judge Martin Colin for possible obstruction of justice and where he is a material and fact witness to several crimes (frauds upon the court) that occurred in his court and must now be investigated as to those crimes that appear to have never been investigated since 9/13/2013 when they were first discovered.

You stated you were aware of Colin’s recent “recusal” but you should be aware that he was initially requested to disqualify and void ALL of his orders by me and Judge Colin denied the disqualification motion and instead the very next day he recused himself instead.

This appears an attempt to not have his orders voided due to the proven and admitted frauds upon his court, including crimes beyond the Moran forgeries and notary frauds that all still remain unprosecuted or investigated by PBSO.

Judge Colin after recusing then proceeded to influence the transfer of the cases to a former Proskauer Rose law firm partner, Judge Coates and if you recall I am pursuing Proskauer for theft of my intellectual properties and their alleged involvement in the crimes of the Estates and Trusts of my parents (see attached Supreme Court of Florida Writ.)

In fact, while my RICO was dismissed as you astutely noted I am still pursuing Proskauer and others involved in the patent thefts and my patents remain suspended and new information as I stated is leading to a petition to reopen not only my RICO but other actions (including a Florida Court Case that was before Judge Jorge Labarga) and all of the matters before you will be included as additional criminal acts that have occurred relating all this together.

You should know that Judge Coates then recused himself Sua Sponte at the first hearing due to his conflicts, yet the transfer and acceptance of the court records to him by Colin may prove to be additional criminal acts.

You again stated in our conversation two weeks ago that you were specifically only targeting your investigation to the Oppenheimer trusts for the minor children and that you did not have time or resources to investigate other crimes.

When you spoke to my wife Candice you told her that you do not investigate crimes committed by Judges and I am unclear why as the Judicial Qualifications Commission and Florida Bar have no jurisdictional powers to investigate criminal statute violations of judges or anyone else.

When I asked you two weeks ago if I needed to speak again to Captain Carol Gregg to have the other crimes you stated you could not investigate investigated by someone else and resources allocated you became upset and told me that I would be violating the “chain of command” if I did that and I asked if I should go to Internal Affairs, at which time you became more disgruntled and told me even if I went to them it would not do me any good that it would only be sent back to you.

To be clear I have already had to go to internal affairs and Captain Gregg regarding the earlier attempts to shut down the investigations without full and formal procedural due process given them due to the interference of Judge Colin with the prior detectives in efforts to have the cases shut down prematurely and let Judge Colin handle the criminal statute violations, which I stated he could not do and was right, leading to the investigations continuing and leading to the Spallina confession and more.

I fear that this influence by Judge Colin may still be interfering with these investigations, especially where PBSO does not think they can investigate criminal acts alleged against judges.  When Detectives Miller and Groover were replaced by you we had not finalized anything with them other than the Kimberly Moran arrest, which as I stated will also possibly have to be re-examined because it appears that statements made by her and Spallina and others to authorities may have been false and misleading leading to her light sentence and her evasion of prosecution for multiple counts of forgery and fraudulent notarizations that were failed to be prosecuted at that time based on perjured and false statements of both her and Spallina to PBSO.

In fact, on March 26, 2015, Judge Colin in the second to last hearing he held stated,

THE COURT: I'm not -- look, nothing is easy
18 here. It's not going to get easier until we can
19 get hearings where I can start to knock off some
20 of the issues, which is what I have been saying
21 now like a broken record.
22 At some point, either Eliot is going to be
23 sustained on his positions or he's going to be
24 overruled, but one way or the other, we can put
25 some of this stuff to rest. The problem is we're
1 doing all of this business with some of the metes [matters]
2 of the case still up in the air where I haven't
3 been able to adjudicate; the claims that Ted
4 should be removed; the claims that there's
5 wrongdoing beyond Spallina and Tescher, the trust
6 is not valid. I mean, give me a chance to rule on
7 that, because once I rule on that, then the matter
8 is over with on those and you'll know one way or
9 the other what to do.
10 Do you understand what I'm saying? I think
11 we have hearing time coming up. Let's use that,
12 you know, prioritize hearings on this case. So as
13 soon as we can, I'll give it to you.

Where Judge Colin is referring to the wrong doings going beyond Tescher and Spallina he is apparently referring to the alleged crimes we thought were being investigated by your offices but appear not to be according to you.

As for his statements regarding if the trusts are valid and other documents were fraudulent, again this is all part of the ongoing investigation that you inherited from Miller and Groover but now claim you are not going back to the crimes they were investigating at this time and instead focusing your investigation on the Oppenheimer crimes, which is not what we understood when you came on board, as we were told you were taking over the whole case and all the matters they were investigating, as well as, any new crimes discovered, especially those discovered when Spallina and Tescher were forced to turn over their records by court order and many new crimes were discovered.  Now all this seems to have fallen through the cracks and you appear to evade investigating them without reason for over a year now.

In December of 2014 my wife Candice and I met with you and provided you with information that there were trusts for our children that had severe problems with them indicating further fraud and gave you witnesses to contact regarding the alleged crimes.

You stated you would get right on it and it is now six months later and you have failed to even begin or according to our last conversation just began.  You claimed in our conversation several months ago that you could not meet Traci Kratish because it was tax season and I am unsure how six months has qualified as tax season.

I was shocked to learn in our conversation two weeks ago that Traci had come to see you several weeks ago and you put her off stating you working on getting documents from others that would be more complete and failed to take her statements, as she is at risk, like others, who are trying to have these crimes exposed and prosecuted.  In our last conversation you stated you finally had contacted Traci and her lawyer and this is almost seven months after I initially reported that crime.

What is equally disturbing is that when you stated in December you were going to focus on the Oppenheimer crimes you stated you would get back to me in a few weeks to intake all the new crimes that we had discovered and it has been seven months and I am still unable to have you intake those crimes and begin investigations regarding all of them as of this week.  The attached letter to you dated January 13, 2015 has additional information regarding the status of the matters we discussed.

I then contacted you on or about the week of March 23, 2015 to invite you to attend a court ordered re-inventorying of properties that I have alleged stolen taking place on March 27, 2015 at my father’s home in regard to complaint 13159967 filed with PBSO regarding theft of properties by Spallina, Tescher, Ted, Rose and others.

I explained that we had discovered that even more items were missing and that Judge Colin was forced to order a RE-inventorying regarding items that were told to the court to be at my father’s home and which were alleged by Mr. Stansbury and myself to not be there.

I invited you to the home to take part in the re-inventorying to determine if further theft had occurred and you refused to go or send an officer to the scene to determine if items had been stolen.  It now appears that all of the items that were told to the court to have been transferred to the home from my mother’s condominium were stolen and Mr. Rose’s statements to the court were false and misleading and again this is matter for criminal investigation as yet another fraud on the court and as grand theft but again you tried to dodge the issue and told me again that I would have to go to the Boca Raton PD to report this as it was out of your jurisdiction.

You may have forgotten that you told me to go to Boca PD several months ago when I first reported the matter to you and I went to the Boca PD and they asked why your agency was not investigating and stated that I had to go back to PBSO and have you investigate the matter.

They stated they had contacted PBSO and it was in your jurisdiction and if you wanted their involvement you could call them and explain.  Again, months have passed and again the other week you tried to again defer the matters to Boca PD claiming you do not have jurisdiction and even claimed you were not aware of the theft claims despite there being a formal filed complaint with PBSO that you have been aware of since we met and that was directed to be filed by Detectives Miller and Groover initially.

I contacted you again on or about April 13, 2015 and informed you that I had been contacted by my attorney at law, Candice Schwager, Esq. of Texas and she had warned my family that we were in imminent danger and to contact state and federal authorities to seek protection.

Again, you did not even contact me back to find out what was going on or take a statement and this is where I began to draw a line regarding your failed investigations into all of these matters, starting with the PBSO report Case #12121312 filed on the day my father died that my brother Ted instigated that alleged that my father may have been murdered by poisoning and the fact that it was booked by PBSO as a hospital record check, which despite being told several times that PBSO was changing the case docketing, this still has not been rectified and corrected as promised and where the person accused was never even questioned by PBSO.

I have also stated that there may be new information from the coroner and other information that may cause this case to not only be corrected in how it was booked but reopened as a possible murder and as of this date you have refused to take that information as well or deal with it.

In fact, when I brought that up you made comments that my dad was old and going to die anyway and probably ate too much high fat chicken soup being Jewish and these comments were beyond offensive and heartless.

I lost great respect for you upon hearing those claims, you even stated that he had 90+ percent blockage in two arteries, as if you were a medical examiner and where those arteries were bypassed many years ago and irrelevant.

I told you that the Doctor in charge of my father at the hospital on the day he died emphatically told us the night he died that his heart was fine and he did not have a heart attack that day at all and thought it was an infectious disease that was causing his body to rapidly melt down and it may have been West Nile or some unknown disease.  

I further told you my father had been seen within the year before his death one of the leading heart surgeons in New York who had worked on former President Bill Clinton and that he had a clean bill of health regarding his heart, in fact the Dr. told him it looked good for another 10+ years.

You stated in our last two conversation that you thought that all of these matters should be investigated by Federal Agents and then offered me a good luck getting someone federally to investigate the matters and I wondered why if you thought all along as you said that this was for federal authorities you have not contacted them and turned the matters over to them yourself for investigation.

As you are aware, when we first met, we talked about the insurance matters involving Spallina, Tescher, Ted and Alan Rose and others that involve allegations of interstate mail and wire fraud, insurance fraud, fraud on a federal court and more, both you and Detective Miller were going to contact federal agents and get us a name to contact and/or get them involved.

The Oppenheimer crimes alleged similarly have interstate mail and wire fraud as well as fraud against my children charged and this too may be better suited for Federal investigators as discussed.  Keep in mind that the insurance fraud alleged to have been committed by Spallina and reported to PBSO was originally delayed after PBSO investigators, including you, told us you did not have jurisdiction to investigate that matter and sent us to the Jacksonville Illinois PD department to investigate the insurance fraud as the fraudulent document was sent by Tescher and Spallina to an insurance company in IL.

Where the Jacksonville PD were then astonished that PBSO had referred me to call them while you had an active investigation going into these same matters and were further confused why your offices did not contact them directly if you thought they needed to be called.

Again, I feel that your team has stymied and delayed investigation with intent and still have failed to contact federal authorities on matters that you were initially involved in regarding the same nexus of events that you know are federal in nature.

In fact, what PBSO has done is try and isolate crimes as if they were unrelated, force repeated reporting to other agencies of several of the crimes to evade investigating them and where all those agencies wonder why you are having me do this and then they are turning me back to PBSO for investigation and yet the matters still are refused investigation by you.

As I stated last week when we spoke I do not think you should proceed any further in these matters until I speak with Captain Gregg and possibly Internal Affairs as I feel you are trying to improperly influence and close the matters before investigating fully all the matters before you.  I have attached the letter I previously sent regarding my problems with your investigation and I just do not think since January anything has really changed and all the while crimes continue to be committed and wholly ignored further endangering my family.

Also, if you can please reply if PBSO has contacted the Florida Bar, the Judicial Qualifications Commission, Chief Justice Jorge Labarga, Judge Martin Colin or Judge David French regarding any of the matters we have brought for investigation and if so when and with whom.  Please make this letter and all attachments part of the record of my cases filed.

Thank you,

Eliot I. Bernstein
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. "

Click Below to Download January 13th, 2015 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Detective Andrew Panzer of the Palm County Sheriff Office.

Below is the Florida Supreme Court Filing regarding the above allegations and Florida Estate Cases

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Alan Rose - Loves to USE FORCE and allegedly claims there is NO TRUTH in the Courts.

Ted Bernstein eMail:

"Alan - I want Eliot's deposition scheduled as soon as you can notice him.  We can discuss the strategy once he is served. I want to go through each claim with you and/or John to determine the legal necessity to respond.  If any reply is necessary, the record must be straight with respect to each. 

This is a rambling, filled with contradictions that need to be exposed for what they are.  If John does not want to tangle with Eliot, remove John immediately. I am sorry to be this blunt, but I do not want to address the John issue again. 

If he is not 100% in support of me as trustee, including how I have protected myself with trust assets and will continue doing so as necessary, and being aggressive and forceful, if need be, with eliot, remove him as counsel.  

I do not want to spend another unnecessary dollar with counsel that is not going to zealously defend me as trustee and protect trust assets.

I cannot be more decisive re this and I say this with no animosity - simply for efficiency sake and my best interest. 

Eliot is in default of production.  Let's serve notice on him that he is in default.

I want Eliot to produce everything he has with respect to these cases, including:

Documents he refers to having that provide trusts for him and/or his children.

Agreements he has signed with my father and mother, together or separately.

All correspondence between him and my parents, together or separately concerning anything he has referenced in his ramblings through this one.

Anything and everything pertaining to iviewit, including his harassment of Jerry Lewin, Al Gortz of Proskauer and their firms. 

I want court proceedings, lawsuits, all correspondence to him and from him including paper and electronic, including video tapes and electronic interviews.

History of incidents at st. Andrews school.

All correspondence with bill Stansbury. Everything related to Feaman / Stansbury

All bank accounts, credit cards, sources of income, loans and gifts.

All correspondence with anyone he has shared estate details.

All correspondence of every type with: walker, puzzio, SAHM, Diana banks, Scott banks, NACLERIO, Dietz, Gefen and every person on his email distribution list. If he doesn't comply, I want all of them deposed.

Everything in which he has mentioned my name including emails, phone calls, letters, complaints to whatever agencies he has made complaints including police, federal, state, regulatory.

Everything and anything he is doing that we are not yet aware of such as online web site attacks.

Everything connected to crystal cox concerning me and anyone else he is extorting and harassing together with her.

Manceri filed production requests. If it is possible to hand eliot a subpoena for his deposition at tomorrows hearing, that would be great. 

I also want feamans deposition taken in connection with this case and what he is doing with Eliot. 

If mediation is scheduled and you feel this is better done after the mediation, I am okay with that. If it is not, let's take his depo.

How much is in Feaman trust account that has been stolen from us? 

I want an accounting. 

Has any money been used for Stansbury defense thus far?

If we are scheduled for mediation, will this be revealed? If we are not, I want to know ASAP what is in account, I want all statements and any expenditures. 

I'm sure I will think of more.

Ted Bernstein"

How can this case really be worth it? Won't Alan Rose take YEARS and rack up hundreds of thousands in fees?

Alan Rose has a NEW CASE. Well Let's keep an eye on this one too; Transparency

"WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (Legal Newsline) – A prominent class action law firm is suing two firms with which it partnered on a class action lawsuit in Florida for allegedly failing to pay it a fee.

Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll, PLLC filed the lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court on May 5 against Anderson + Wanca and Bock & Hatch LLC, claiming it is owed about $280,000 in fees for joining in on the class action lawsuit. Bock & Hatch removed the case to U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 26.

The suit claims Cohen Milstein agreed in March 2012 to to serve as the local counsel for a class action suit in which the firms were involved in Florida. The two sides came to terms on a fee agreement and also agreed that Cohen would receive 20 percent of the attorneys' fees awarded in the class action suit, the complaint says.

In October, the court awarded about $1.4 million in attorneys fees. Cohen Milstein claims Anderson has not paid the 20 percent contingency fee made in the fee agreement.

In March, Anderson acknowledged the fee agreement, but “demanded” Cohen Milstein reduce the fee, the lawsuit said.

In addition to the $280,000, the plaintiff is also seeking lost profit damages, plus court costs for filing the suit.

The law firm is represented by Alan B. Rose of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A. in West Palm Beach, Fla.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida case 9:15-cv-80662"


Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Why is Alan Rose Knowingly, Willfully, Bullying Eliot Bernstein and holding up Legal Process in this Estate Case? How is Alan Rose SO SURE that he is above the law? Alan Rose is So Whiny, Petty and Unprofessional.

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:37 AM
To: Benjamin P. Brown (

Subject: Objection to IRA changes at this time


Briefly, my objection to the IRA accounts being rolled over into new accounts is that we have already alleged that millions of dollars may have been taken from the IRA’s inappropriately through fraud and therefore I do not want the accounts to be changed at all until investigation and auditing of the current and past IRA’s can be closely and forensically investigated. 

I would suggest that until this is complete no one make any changes to the accounts where records could be lost in the shuffle, agents changed and documents then lost (as you know we have a repeated problem with lost and missing documents already). 

Therefore, to preserve evidence I think it is best that until we have ALL the information regarding both my mother and father’s current accounts we sit tight and make no changes that could be construed as part of a further fraud

Please attach this email to any pleading regarding the IRA to Judge Colin, I do not think he understood that we have already alleged that millions are missing and the records have not been tendered and that this could be a huge can of worms that all evidence should be preserved as is.  

Have you received the account information that you requested yet and have you contacted Chris Prindle for information regarding the missing beneficiaries?  Eliot

Eliot I. Bernstein"

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 11:06 AM
To: 'Alan Rose'; 'Ben Brown'

Subject: RE: Bernstein - letter from Ben Brown

Alan, thank you for the compliment, the estate administration under my care would not have fraudulent documents, forgeries, altered estate and trust documents and would have preserved my parents' intents. 

Under you, Tescher, Spallina, Mancerie et al. it is fraught with fraud and crimes and this is
what is costing everyone a fortune, until of course we recover them from you in damages in all current and future actions against you for your part in advancing these frauds. 

Your attempt to spin these costs as a burden I have caused is laughable but good evidence for future actions against you, which will prove that ALL these costs are due to you and those that engaged you. 

Ben, please include this email to Judge Colin as well.  Eliot"

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:57 PM
To: 'Alan Rose'; 'Peter M. Feaman'; 'Ben Brown'; 'Linda McDaniel'; ''; ''; 'David Simon'; ''; 'John Pankauski'; 'Irwin Block'; 'Donald Tescher'

Subject: RE: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Case # 502012CP004391XXXXSB - Notice of Hearing

Alan, I did not say you usurped my hearing time but you seem to get so much wrong it is hard to keep up with, I stated clearly that you materially changed the motions that were to be heard that day of mine to what you wanted and no one agreed on, including Colin, who repeated he wanted to hear my motions, especially that one you particularly fear, the motion for construction of…  that you have now tried to erase twice and replace and we keep having to go round in circles while you waste more monies and time of everyone’s. 

I am not sure what to do here as Sherrie Norton is the one who advised us to pick the date of the two she offered and schedule the hearing as he would want to hear this personally, especially when she heard that the motions she scheduled with Candice were being substantively changed

Perhaps you can attend teleconference, if not you can call over there to Colin’s office and get some ideas for a change. 

We can always add your motion to have Ted PR to my list, after the motions to remove you and then him are heard. 

I am not willing to change any of my other scheduled motions for my hearing date.  Let me know your decision or I can call Sherrie again and please stop the personal harassments of me and trying to have people coerce me to do what you want.  

If you agree to have the terms above, my Motions as so stated in the Notice of Hearing and your one for Ted as PR, we can probably save everyone time and effort from your further delays and games.  I would then prepare the Notice of Hearing properly and with integrity.  I will be asking for sanctions and fees for your misguided efforts to change my hearing for the second time.  Best ~ Eliot

From: Alan Rose []
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:42 PM
To: Peter M. Feaman; Eliot Ivan Bernstein; Ben Brown; Linda McDaniel;;; David Simon;; John Pankauski; Irwin Block; Donald Tescher
Subject: FW: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Case # 502012CP004391XXXXSB - Notice of Hearing

I am not available for this hearing (I have advised everyone of this by email) and object to (i) the short notice and (ii) the fact that we would need one.

No one usurped Eliot’s hearing time.  Its about time the people Eliot seems to trust, Ben Brown and Peter Feaman/Jeff Royer, put a stop to this endless game. 

I asked for a status conference and thought everyone agreed, and Eliot advised that he did not realize what I had asked for.  So, I withdrew that and we all went back to the Court.  No one tricked Eliot.

At the hearing, Judge Colin said he wanted to do the PR motions first, and would entertain other motions or do a status conference on other motions.

This week, Judge Colin added the motion to disqualify Ted’s counsel to that list, because it must be decided first.

There is no need for this hearing, and I cannot attend in any event.
    Alan B. Rose, Esq."

-----Original Message-----
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 11:06 AM
To: 'Alan Rose'; 'Ben Brown'

Subject: RE: Bernstein - letter from Ben Brown

Alan, thank you for the compliment, the estate administration under my care would not have fraudulent documents, forgeries, altered estate and trust documents and would have preserved my parents' intents.  
Under you, Tescher, Spallina, Mancerie et al. it is fraught with fraud and crimes and this is what is costing everyone a fortune, until of course we recover them from you in damages in all current and future actions against you for your part in advancing these frauds. 

Your attempt to spin these costs as a burden I have caused is laughable but good evidence for future actions against you, which will prove that ALL these costs are due to you and those that engaged you. 

Ben, please include this email to Judge Colin as well.  Eliot

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Rose []
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:10 AM
To: Alan Rose
Cc: Ben Brown; Eliot Ivan Bernstein; Linda McDaniel; John Pankauski;; Peter M. Feaman;;

Subject: Re: Bernstein - letter from Ben Brown

Do what you think is best.

But I do think we will all see what estate administration would look like
under an Eliot PR-ship.

Alan B. Rose
Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A.

Originally At

Monday, June 1, 2015

Alan Rose Tough talkin' Gibberish. Hey Alan TIME to Notify your Liability Carrier DUDE.

"Attached are draft orders regarding the hearings of today before Judge Colin. Please let me have your comments at your earliest convenience.

                Best wishes.



"Alan, your notice of appearance attached herein comes at a strange time, as you can see from the attached receipt, the Court had officially docketed you and your firm and John Pankauski and his firm and others officially as Respondents/Defendants in these matters prior, as was requested of the court on June 04, 2014 when I filed my motion to deal with you as added new Respondents, the monies to add you and others have been deposited as you can see in the courts register early this morning prior to your latest improper filings. 

From this point forward please govern yourself as a named Respondent under all applicable rules of attorney conduct and laws. 

As such, I will anticipate your voluntarily removal and disqualification of yourself as counsel shortly and voluntary withdrawal ALL of your prior pleadings that were filed without having filed a notice of appearance and while you were aware of your adverse interests and your being a fact and material witness in the events involving the frauds in and upon the Court, Beneficiaries, Creditors and Interested Parties with prior removed counsel and fiduciaries who engaged you.

We will be seeking to schedule your deposition shortly and demand that you promptly turn over all of your records to the Court or the Palm Beach County Sheriff and send copies to anyone else you are obligated to regarding your involvement in any way with any parties who have committed the civil torts alleged and the criminal acts already proven and admitted.

Thank you for your prompt attention to these matters.  Please, now that you and your firm are Respondents in these matters please report this to your liability carrier or else insurance fraud laws may also apply against you for failure to disclose litigation as required. 

I have given you and your firm and its partners and of counsel  and associates ample notice, since June 04, 2014 of your conflicted and legally abusive continued representations but you, like your client Ted fail to heed good advice with the best of intentions and therefore have left no alternative recourse. 

My motion to hear the information on you being added as a Respondent and what to do next and how to handle you forward is pending scheduling on the July 14th 21014 that you continue to refuse to cooperate in scheduling that hearing can be dealt with once I get that set but I do not think you will be able to represent further in any capacity other than Respondent/Defendand henceforth. 

Best ~ Eliot


"I object to these orders, as Ted is not the successor trustee of the alleged Trusts as far as I know legally and he cannot now serve in any capacities for a myriad of reasons.  

This is why you Alan should not be acting further either, especially where there is a motion to add you as a Respondent/Defendant and to remove your client for a host of reasons, including your direct past involvement with Tescher and Spallina to advance their frauds and again this continued action by you just appears more fraud, waste and abuse but I will take that up with Judge Colin if necessary. 

Have you notified your liability carrier of your situation in these matters and that you have been noticed of your involvement in the litigation as a Respondent/Defendant yet. 

Can you please send over your carrier information so that I may notice them as well in the event that you are not?

 Thanks ~ Eliot"


"If that is your only objection, we will send in the orders with that noted to judge. 

Alan B. Rose"


" Alan, I also object for other reasons, including but far from limited to that there is a pending motion to add you as a Respondent for your adverse interests created from your involvement with Tescher and Spallina and others in the already proven and admitted criminal acts that have taken place by prior Attorneys at Law and Fiduciaries in these matters that without question now make you both a material and fact witnesses regarding the criminal acts and your factual involvement with the perpetrators during the time of the criminal acts.  This alone should force your voluntary Disqualification from these matters.

Your continued actions, despite your requirements under attorney conduct codes and law to disqualify voluntarily from matters when you have adverse interests and conflicted, will be imparted as further aiding and abetting the prior crimes and continuing new one, including but not limited to, obstruction of justice through an intentional attempt to deny due process through such continued improper actions as an Officer of the Court while knowing of your and your clients adverse interests and conflicts that preclude further involvement.

A note to the attorneys at law involved in these matters who are receiving this email, I believe you are duty bound to report attorneys at law who have adverse interests and conflicts and refuse to disqualify when these are apparent and yet further advance improper legal arguments through the violation of their attorney conduct codes and law in proceedings you are involved with them in and certainly Alan and Ted’s involvement with the former Attorneys at Law and parties involved in the already proven and admitted crimes, is irrefutably reason that they will be material and fact witnesses and have adverse interests and should disgorge themselves of any fiduciary and/or legal capacities they are acting in and cease and desist all contact in such capacities with any other attorneys at law involved.  

If you are aware that Ted and Alan will be material and fact witnesses in these matters and cannot continue to act impartially and continue to correspond with them, settle with them or make any other communications with them in these improper capacities, this could be construed as aiding and abetting and obstruction and more.  Just something to consider.

Alan, I and hopefully all the lawyers in this communiqué, will be objecting to any orders you put forth while conflicted and with adverse interests as further FRAUD ON THE COURT and the Beneficiaries and Interested parties, in order to cover up the already proven and admitted crimes and further aid and abet those attorneys and fiduciaries who brought you into these matters and whom you acted with in perpetrating their frauds.  

I also will be filing additional criminal charges for the obstruction et al. against you and your firm and all partners, associates, of counsel and employees that participate in any way in these matters forward.  I believe the Attorneys at Laws involved and copied herein may also due what they are legally and ethically required to do and report you and Ted and file with the proper authorities instantly regarding your continued misconduct and more.  Please, do the right thing under law and your ethical cannons and voluntarily cease your misconduct and cease further FRAUD, WASTE and ABUSE of Estates assets and time.

Best ~ Eliot

Thanks ~ Eliot"